![]() |
Subfamily and generic |
(Setchell 1943: 134 - as Lithophylleae)
Thallus non-geniculate; some but not all cells of contiguous vegetative filaments normally joined by secondary pit connections; cell fusions apparently absent or comparatively rare; tetrasporangia/ bisporangia lacking apical plugs and borne within uniporate conceptacles.
Ezo
COMMENTS: Adey et al. included the absence of plastids and pigmentation as a
diagnostic character, but Woelkerling (1988) concluded that further studies are needed to
confirm this. Ezo is similar to Lithophyllum, but for the possession of
haustoria.
ETYMOLOGY: Ezo after the old name for Hokkaido, the type locality.
COMMENTS: (after Chamberlain 1991, Woelkerling 1988). Lithophyllum is distinguished from Titanoderma on the basis of:
- the possession of a basal layer consisting predominately of non-palisade cells, and
- no areas of bistratose thallus are present, as the thallus begins to thicken immediately behind the primary meristematic cell.
See Titanoderma for further details.
ETYMOLOGY: from the Greek lithos (stone) and the latinized Greek word phyllon
(leaf).
(after Chamberlain 1991, Woelkerling 1988).
COMMENTS: Titanoderma is distinguished from Lithophyllum on the basis of:
- the possession of a basal layer consisting predominately of palisade cells, and
- at least some areas of bistratose thallus are present, usually at the margin in thicker species.
Campbell and Woelkerling (1990) and Woelkerling and Campbell (1992) did not consider Titanoderma
to be distinguishable from Lithophyllum because palisade and non-palisade cells
as well as bistratose and non-bistratose margins can occur together in the same thallus to
varying degrees. In southern Africa, the tropical Indo-Pacific and other areas where I
have examined specimens, no difficulty was found in assigning species to Titanoderma or
Lithophyllum on the basis of the two characters noted above. The genera would
appear to be much more difficult to distinguish in Australia (Campbell and Woelkerling
1990, and Woelkerling and Campbell 1992), further work is necessary to determine with
certainty whether Titanoderma and Lithophyllum should really be considered
congeneric. In this treatment, I have therefore chosen to use the generic concepts of Lithophyllum
and Titanoderma as in Chamberlain (1991) until such time as genetic studies can
be conducted to evaluate this controversy more fully.
ETYMOLOGY: from the Greek mythological Titan and derma skin.
Tenarea is organised like two Titanoderma thalli growing back-to-back, and indeed some phycologists believe that it is congeneric with Titanoderma. Should that be the case, Tenarea is the older name and would take precidence over Titanoderma as the correct name for the genus. However, further studies are needed to determine whether this is indeed the case.
![]()
Derek Keats,
updated 03/09/01